On 12:00 on 03. 02. 03. 02. 12:00, the Defendant came to move to the Ecom, which is the point of accident, in front of the Ecom, while driving at the speed of 80 kilometers per hour by using one lane among three lanes in the direction of the same Sin-dong distance in the direction of the same Sin-do. All drivers shall proceed to the intersection where signal, etc. is installed, according to the signal, etc., and have the duty of care to drive vehicles safely by checking the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care.

However, the defendant neglected this and proceeded without suspending red signals, and the indictment contains some omissions, but the indictment is corrected by adding it.

The driver's negligence caused the driver's vehicle's driving and the driver's vehicle's driving on the right side of the F-Vehicle's vehicle.

Ultimately, the victim G (38 S, female) suffered from the following negligence: (a) the garment of the wall that requires a two-day medical treatment to the victim H(7 e.g., the victim’s e.g., the victim’s e., the victim’s e.g., the victim’s e., the victim’s e.g., the victim’s e., the victim’s e.g., the victim’s e., the e., the victim’s e.g.,

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the establishment of facts constituting a crime ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads to a judge to have a reasonable doubt. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that the aforementioned convictions, even if suspicions of guilts such as the defendant’s assertion or defense are contradictory or uncomfortable (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Do3722, Sept. 26, 2013). B. (1) Specific determination is based on evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the interests of the defendant should be determined by G’s respective statements in this court and police, and in this court and police by J, a witness.