A. The status of the Plaintiff and C (the deceased on July 2, 2014, hereinafter “the deceased”) are between the Plaintiff and the deceased. The Defendant is the wife of the deceased.

B. The Plaintiff’s monetary loan 1) The Plaintiff loaned money to the Deceased, <1> between March 1995 and April 1, 1995, to the Deceased; <1> D & 1130 square meters in Ansan-si and its ground cement brick slocket, general restaurants, single-story houses, and single-story affiliated companies (attached Table 1 and 2; hereinafter “D land and D buildings”).

56,800,000 won for purchase price and 3,200,000 won for registration tax, and ② between May 1996 and June 1, 1996, E forest land and 952 square meters for E forest land (attached Table No. 4, but it was owned solely by the deceased as the result of partition of co-owned property on February 4, 2003.

"E land" in total before and after the division;

(3) Around February 1996, G G 159 square meters and H 548 square meters and 548 square meters (attached Table 5 and 6; hereinafter referred to as “I land,” in total, of two parcels of real estate.

) The deceased lent KRW 10,000,000 to be used as purchase price. On April 18, 1995, the deceased completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land E on June 11, 1996 (the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the portion of F forest land before the division, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the land E as of February 4, 2003, according to the partition of co-owned property as of February 4, 2003.

2) Around 199, the Deceased purchased the JJ (attached Form No. 3, hereinafter “J land”) of Ansan-si in 199, but was rendered a favorable judgment by filing a civil suit against K, L, M, etc. at the end of the conflict with the seller.

(Seoul High Court Decision 97Ga6025, Daegu District Court Decision 99Na8252, and Supreme Court Decision 2000Da41667). At the time of the lawsuit, the Plaintiff was requested by the Deceased, and at the time of the lawsuit, 2,300,000 won to the Deceased on October 15, 1997, 2,100,000 won to the attorney-at-law in charge of the appellate case on June 9, 1999, and 2,100,000 won to the Plaintiff. < Amended by Act No. 6310, Aug. 10,