If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a Chinese national who entered the status of stay for visiting on December 2, 2013, and is currently working as a park from “the long-term period of wedding Do Co., Ltd., Ltd., which is located in 11-1 (Tangdong), 27 Do, Kim Jong-si as at the time of birth in Kim Jong-si.”

1. On July 3, 2016, at around 17:30 on July 3, 2016, the Defendant interfered with his business, having drunkd “E” operated by the victim D in Kimhae-si, and having the coffee set on the top of the line at the place, with the mind of the Defendant “drawing rice”;

Doz. Do. Do. Do.

The victim interfered with the victim's work by force by avoiding disturbance while under the influence of alcohol for about 20 minutes, such as throwing rice, which had been in a fluence, on the floor with the view to "," etc.

2. In the event that the victim D was suffering from disturbance at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, such as paragraph 1, the injured Defendant, by hand, inflicted an injury on the victim, on the ground that the victim D was satisfing the Defendant, thereby pushing the victim’s satching, thereby pushing the victim about about two weeks of medical treatment.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, around 17:50 on July 3, 2016, on the 864-2 Dong-dong, Kimhae-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Kimhae-dong, does not have a police officer who asked the circumstances of the case.

C. In the influence of alcohol, a riotous act was committed by very rough words and behavior while under the influence of alcohol, such as booming a police officer by hand, with the desire to “I am Madden, I am Mad,” and committing a disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of injury diagnosis reports and investigation reports;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of cancellation in the official document), the selection of a fine for each offense (the point of agreement with the victim for the crime of interference with business and injury, the first offense).

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;