beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.07.24 2014노604

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing by the defendant on the grounds of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2006 has a history of criminal punishment of one million won or more due to the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2006, causing traffic accidents that cause human and material damage in drinking condition and escape without relief measures, etc., and thus the quality of the crime of the crime of this case is not good. However, there are no specific criminal records, on the other hand, the defendant's error is against the defendant, and the same criminal records of the same kind are eight years prior to the above, there are no specific criminal records; the amount of the defendant's running car is covered by comprehensive insurance; the victim's running car is covered by comprehensive insurance; the victim's deposit amount was agreed with G; the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the fine (eight million won) imposed by the court below is too unjustifiable and unfair.

2. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.