However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

At around 00:00 on November 1, 2014, the Defendant, without any reason, threatened the victim C (the 50-year-old) who first considered at the window B in Changwon-si, with the following: (a) without any reason, expressed that the victim C (the 50-year-old-old-old-year-old-old-old-old-old-pated-pated-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Criminal Crimes, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (including the fact that there is no criminal record related to an act of violence);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;