On May 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the main branch of the Chuncheon District Court on September 4, 2014, which became final and conclusive on September 4, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Busan Detention Center on May 19, 2015.

1. Fraud against the victim B;

A. On November 2013, the Defendant: (a) had the victim B (31) (31) who requires money to obtain a loan from a lending company without any particular property or monthly income in excess of KRW 30 million; (b) had the lending company used a significant portion of the loan to repay the Defendant’s debts, living expenses, etc.; and (c) had no intent to transfer the loan to the victim.

On November 2013, the Defendant issued 10 copies of a certificate of personal seal impression in the name of the victim in the vicinity of the bus terminal located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and one cell phone (10 copies of a certificate of personal seal impression in the name of the victim, one copy of a passbook, and one cell phone from the victim B.

On November 7, 2013, the Defendant obtained a loan of KRW 5 million from mountain and loan (state) in the name of the victim using a certificate of personal seal impression, etc. issued as above at a location of Busan and less than Busan and obtained a loan from the Defendant without delivering it to the victim at his own discretion, and the Defendant obtained a loan from the lending company in the name of the victim at least seven times from around that time to December 4, 2014, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, and instead received a loan from the lending company on a total of seven occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form, and instead used it by the Defendant at his own discretion.

B. The Defendant, at around January 3, 2014, was a D agency located in Busan City’s annual system C, and the fact is sufficient for the victim despite the victim’s intention or ability to pay the price on a timely basis even if the Defendant opened a mobile phone under the victim B’s name in excess of his/her obligation as set forth in the foregoing A.