As the Defendant entered into a lease contract with D representative director E on October 30, 2012 with respect to real estate owned by the Defendant, the Defendant knew that E continues to engage in the parking lot business even though he/she renounced the lease contract and intended to recover it to its original state on October 30, 2012, and instructed F to store gravel at the entrance of the D parking lot.

From October 31, 2012, from 18:15 to 19:00 on October 31, 2012, F interfered with F’s business operation by force of the stores operating the business in the above D including the victim G, by piling up the gravel of 15 tons of truck at the entrance of the said D parking lot, making it difficult for customers visiting this place to enter the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant instigated F to interfere with the victim's work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 314(1) and 31(1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1)), such as the fact that the defendant is led to the crime of this case, the circumstance leading to the crime of this case, the fact that many merchants, including G, want the Defendant’s wife, and the fact that restitution