2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant confessions the facts of the crime and reflects the fact, that the defendant agreed with the victim in the court below, and that the defendant is not suitable for economic conditions as a basic livelihood recipient, but the defendant again found the victim for the reason that the victim did not receive his own apology after causing injury to the victim. The crime is not good, and the court below seems to have taken the action by reducing the fine requested for summary consideration in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no special change in the trial, and there are other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, environment, sex behavior, motive for the crime, and conditions before and after the crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.