beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.14 2018나2022884

총회 재판위원회 판결 무효 확인의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s appeal shall be dismissed, and the court shall dismiss the lawsuit as to any additional claim;

2...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this part of the judgment on basic facts is as set out in paragraph 1 of the judgment of the first instance except for modification as follows:

Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From 2, 15 to 3 pages are as follows:

6 August 26, 2016, the prosecution members belonging to the Defendant Chungcheong District Trial Committee: (c) on the following grounds: (i) on August 26, 2016, the act of nullifyinging the authority of the armed forces with the right of a church or right of pledge; (ii) the act of abusing the right and the escape in connection with the execution of the church finance; (iii) on the first constitutional progress and the operation of a meeting; (iv) the act of destroying evidence against one’s own tort; (v) the act of aiding and abetting by omission in the business embezzlement of the head of the C Educational Department G; (vii) the act of interfering with the audit; (vii) the act of taking appropriate measures with respect to the loans to and construction of the company; (viii) the act of abusing the Plaintiff; (iv) the act of forging the Plaintiff; and (v) the act of forging the church by causing conflicts and disputes between the members; and (iii) the act of hiding the church and his/her property management on the ground that he/she has been convicted of the unlawful acts of destroying and management of the church.