도로교통법위반
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 2, 2015, at around 08:15, the Defendant driven a C Atop car and driven the two-lanes in front of the new response distance in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, with the direction of the airside in the Dong-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, to turn to the left at the front intersection. In order to turn to the left, the Defendant driven the vehicle at the front intersection in accordance with the Road Traffic Act and waiting for entry.
2. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant driven a vehicle in the same place as that described in paragraph 1 at around 08:16, and in the same manner as that described in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the vehicle in the future.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;
1. Application of enforcement manual statutes;
1. Article 156 subparagraph 3, Article 23, and Article 22 (2) 1 of the Road Traffic Act (electiveity of fines) concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Penalty fine of 200,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (The fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine imposed on the accused, and the circumstances leading to the criminal act in this case shall be considered);