사해행위취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for adding the following judgments to the new argument in the court of first instance, No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the reasoning of the judgment is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation as to this case shall be cited in accordance
2. In addition, the defendant thought that it would be the best way to continue the business of the Bank of Korea, which had been operated after the loan of the loan of this case, with the loan of this case, and that the defendant borrowed money from the defendant while offering each movable property listed in the separate list of movable property as a security for transfer, and therefore, the transfer of this case between B and the defendant did not constitute fraudulent act, but did not have intention to harm to B, and the defendant was also a bona fide beneficiary. The following circumstances, i.e., there is no evidence to deem that B was operating the Bank of Korea as H around May 6, 2013, which is the date the contract of the transfer of this case was concluded, around May 6, 2013, there is no evidence to deem that B was operating the Bank of Korea as the date the transfer of this case was made, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant did not have any reason to acknowledge that B had any other reason to use the transfer of movable property as the beneficiary of this case, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that B and the beneficiary of this case.
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is without merit.