However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 29, 2015, around 15:47, the Defendant opened a door of E-mail car owned by the victim D and stolen money and valuables worth KRW 150,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won in cash, and KRW 37,550,000,000,000,000,000 won in cash, which were parked in front of the Ma-gu, Ansan-si.

2. On October 6, 2015, around 13:57, the Defendant: (a) opened a door of the Victim G G-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D and G;

1. On-site photographs and records of the relevant pictures of each case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Where he/she intrudes into any place, other than indoor residential space, in the mitigated area (4 months to 10 months), two types of theft in general property (general larceny) (4 months to 10 months) (special mitigation).

2. The defendant's age, sex, environment, background of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, value of damaged articles, etc., as the fact that the sentence is against the decision of sentence, a motor vehicle opening a door that has not been corrected because of the same criminal record and the theft of property is bad;