beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.04.09 2012가단18602

손해배상

Text

1. For each share of 130.68/2524.56, out of 178 square meters in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu Seoul:

A. Defendant D: (a) on Nov. 23, 1994, the Plaintiff Company A.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Seven owners of Songpa-gu Seoul, HI, J, K, L, F, and M (N,O, P, Q, R, S, Defendant D) removed the above ground-based housing, and completed a construction permit on June 17, 192 for the new construction of one apartment unit of the first and the tenth floor above (hereinafter “instant apartment unit”) on each land. On November 23, 1994, Plaintiff A purchased the instant apartment unit of the 502 unit between N and N, the representative of the owner of the building on December 24, 2001 (the ownership transfer registration on the part of exclusive use on December 24, 2001), Plaintiff B concluded the sale registration on May 11, 199 with the owner of the building on each of the instant apartment units of the 802 unit of the building on each of the instant 19 units of the building on each of the 20-V units of the building on 19-5 units of the building on 20-5 units of the building on each of the 19-5th 2.

B. On April 16, 1996 with respect to the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Dong Dong, Defendant D, which was the Defendant D owner, on April 16, 1996, for the land of this case (hereinafter “instant land”), the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of Dong Dong, Defendant D, which was the Defendant D’s wife due to the consultation and division on December 4, 1996 (the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Defendant D’s wife, who was the Defendant D’s wife due to the inheritance due to the consultation and division on December 4, 1996), the Industrial Bank of Korea filed a lawsuit for cancellation of loans and fraudulent act against Defendant D and Dong W’s heir as Seoul East District Court 96Ga1347, and on November 21, 1996, the sales contract between Defendant D and W was revoked on the ground that it was a fraudulent act, and it became final and conclusive on December 38, 1996, as the final judgment became final and conclusive on December 38, 1996.