beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2020.01.10 2019고단1368

모욕

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was aware of the victim B (Nam, 79 years old) before two years ago.

At around 14:00 on September 8, 2019, the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly referring the victim as “Dju store”, “E is doing so, and as the victim delivers the horses to E in the instant case to E, and as the victim delivers the horses to E, it is not possible for E, the victim is not aware of the fact that the victim sent the horses to E, and as the victim sent the horses to E, i.e., e., the victim, etc., and “E is being released, i.e., f., f., f., f., f., f., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g.

2. Determination:

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. On November 11, 2019, after the filing of the instant indictment, a statement of withdrawal of the victim’s complaint was submitted.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;