However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

To the extent that it does not affect the defendant's exercise of the right of defense, the following facts charged are organized (E to arrange victim F as victim D) and criminal facts are recognized:

On March 29, 2015, at around 04:34, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft against the victim D-owned market price of KRW 2,00,00,000, which is the victim D-owned in loading the Poter of the Poter parked in the roads of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) around 04:34, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes written in C;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of fines, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Scope of Recommendation Punishment] The grounds for sentencing under Article 59 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Property [No person who has a basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months): [Determination of sentence] [Determination of sentence]: The defendant seems to have led to the crime of this case, and have divided his mistake, and return to the victim without the value of the damaged goods of this case. Unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant committed again the crime of this case even though he had a history of punishment for suspension of execution for the same kind of crime, the defendant committed the crime of this case in spite of the fact that he had already been punished for suspension of execution on one occasion and other circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act