beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.21 2016고단3358

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 3358] Around 13:00 on July 1, 2016, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and food to the victim under the “D cafeteria” operated by the victim C in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received the total amount of KRW 34,00,00 from the injured party, such as 2 Byung and 2 Galleba, in the same place, from the injured party, and acquired them by deception.

[2016 Highest 4089] around 11:30 on July 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 20,000,00, in total, from the victim F, in the “G” restaurant operated by Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food cost, he would make payment; (c) had the victim induce the victim by ordering alcohol and food; and (d) had the victim do so.

[2016 Highest 4174] The Defendant, around 16:00 on August 10, 2016, placed the “J restaurant” operated by the victim I located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul). The facts are as follows: (a) if the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount of food, but did not pay the amount; and (b) ordered the victim to provide alcohol, alcohol, etc.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received alcoholic beverages equivalent to the sum of KRW 21,00,00 from the damaged party, etc. in the same place, and acquired them by deceiving the victim.

[2018 Highest 186] Around November 18, 2017, the Defendant ordered a so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called scoped restaurant operated by the victim L, located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with no intent or ability to pay the food cost.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 19,00 won in total from the injured party, one breabbb, one bat, and two galmb, one bat, and two galmb, respectively.

(i) the evidence;