건물명도(인도)
The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the action shall be revoked.
The appeal of the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) and the addition to this court.
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance [founded grounds for recognition] is written by the following: (b) the facts without dispute; (c) evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 22; and (d) evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (which include numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (d) the purport of the whole pleadings; and (e) except for the addition to the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth below, the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as set forth in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act; and (e) the same shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of
(c)
On July 22, 2020, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement (including the purport of refusal of the renewal of the contract; hereinafter the same shall apply) on the ground of a violation of Article 10(1)8 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act. On September 1, 2020, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiffs to renew the instant lease agreement.
2. Summary of the parties' arguments;
A. On September 11, 2018, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement (hereinafter “the first termination notification”) on or around September 201, 201, and notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement (hereinafter “the second termination notification”) on or around July 22, 2020 on the grounds of fire risk, lessee’s breach of duty, etc. (hereinafter “the second termination notification”). Each termination notification of the instant lease was terminated, or each termination notification of the instant lease was lawful refusal, and the instant lease was terminated as of October 17, 2018 or October 17, 2020.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiffs.
2) The Defendant demanded renewal of the instant lease agreement pursuant to Article 10 of the Protection of Building Lease for the Defendant, and the Plaintiffs cannot refuse the Defendant’s request for renewal without justifiable grounds. Thus, the instant lease agreement was legally renewed.
I would like to say.
Therefore, the lease contract of this case is concluded upon the termination or expiration of the lease term.