However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 16, 2014, at around 09:06, the Defendant driven a vehicle of Hegel Cgelaki 2, and led to the front of the entrance of the Hegel village in the gelg of the Chungcheongnamsan-gun, Chungcheongnamsan-gun, to the intersection of the new village from the surface of the Hegel village at the port of the monthly village.

At all times, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed in advance and accurately operate the brakes and steering gear in order to turn to the left on the one-lane road where the center line is marked with a yellow solid line, and to not exceed the center line.

The Defendant neglected to do so and conflict with the Defendant’s entire part of the victim D(38 years of age, inn) E driving, which was located in the opposite direction, with the entire part of the Defendant driving vehicle.

The Defendant, in the foregoing accident, suffered from the Defendant’s East F (53 years of age, n.e., a pley l.e., a chest l., a chest l.m., a chest l.m., which requires a two-day medical treatment for the Defendant’s passenger F (53 years of age, n.e., a chest l., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m. (52 years of age), a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.m., a l.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared D and G;

1. The actual survey report and accident photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The degree of injury suffered by the victims due to the instant accident caused by the Defendant’s intrusion on the central line is not somewhat complicated for the reason of sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act regarding orders to provide community service and attend lectures.

However, the defendant is seriously against the defendant, and there is no same criminal record.

Also, the Defendant.