A. The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. It does not seem that there are new circumstances or special changes in circumstances that can be reflected in the sentencing after the pronouncement of the judgment of the court below, and further, even if the court below comprehensively takes into account the circumstances and various conditions of sentencing stated in the grounds for sentencing as well as the records, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too heavy or unhued so far as it

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal of this case by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.