However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On October 23, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of one million won or more as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court, and on March 21, 2008, a fine of three million won or more as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 7, 2015, at around 23:30, the Defendant driven BluxG automobiles with a drunk alcohol concentration of about 0.129% without obtaining a driver’s license from around the 2km section from the front of the restaurant where the Defendant was unaware of the trade name in the upper roads of the Daegu Suwon-dong, Daegu-dong to the front roads of the Daegu Young-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous conviction: Application of each summary order of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (a person who has no criminal record of confession, reflectivity, or suspended sentence or heavier punishment);

1. It shall be decided as ordered on the grounds of probation, order to attend a lecture, Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;