2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflects the fact that the instant accident occurred, such as the fact that there is an peculiar point in the structure and signal system of the intersection, the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim, and that the Defendant was the initial offender and the Defendant’s economic situation is insufficient.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant's access to yellow signal by causing injury to the victim for a four-day period of medical treatment. The case is not less than that of the victim, and the court below seems to have set a punishment relatively relatively less light than the other cases of the same kind in full consideration of the defendant's age, environment, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.