However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a kar Switzerland foreigner who entered the Republic of Korea with a visa (H-2) on August 13, 2015.

피고인은 2015. 7. 22. 경 키 르기 스스 탄 비쉬 켁 아크 훈 바 예 브 35번 가 키 르기 스스 탄 대한민국 대사관에서, 일명 ‘C’ 라는 브로커에게 6,000 달러를 주고, 사실 피고인의 어머니가 이른바 ‘ 고려 인’ 이 아닌데도 ‘ 고려 인’ 인 것처럼 위조된 출생 증명서를 ‘C ’로부터 교부 받은 다음, 사증 발급 신청서를 제출하면서 위와 같이 위조된 허위 출생 증명서를 첨부 제출하여 부모의 일방 또는 조부모의 일방이 대한민국 국적을 보유하였던 경우에 발급되는 방문 취업 (H-2) 사증을 발급 받았다.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above “C”, filed an application for a visa with a public official in charge of issuing visas belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea, by deceptive means, at the same time interfering with the legitimate performance of duties of the public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application for visa issuance, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation an immigration offender at the request of an investigative agency;

1. Articles 137 and 30 (Interference with the performance of official duties by fraudulent means) of the Criminal Act relevant to the crime, Article 94 subparagraph 3 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 7-2 subparagraph 2 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., reflectiveness, motive of crimes, criminal records, etc.);