2. It is recognized that the decision-making defendant divided his mistake into a primary offender, and that the defendant deposited some money for the victim.

However, in light of the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, the damage amount is considerable, and the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim, the balance of sentencing with the same crime, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.