2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. According to the reasoning of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the claim for the price of goods, the plaintiff is a company operating the agricultural and livestock products distribution business, and the defendant is a person engaged in wholesale and retail business with the trade name "E", and the plaintiff can be found to have supplied the defendant with food materials equivalent to the total amount of KRW 126,630,520 from August 2016 to February 2017, since the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the remainder of KRW 34,387,50 after deducting the amount of KRW 126,630,520 from the amount of the goods price of KRW 126,630,520 from the amount of the goods price of KRW 126,630,520 and the delay damages therefrom.

B. As of December 1, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) indicated the following circumstances in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3; (b) indicated the Plaintiff’s transaction statement as the sales claim against the Defendant; (c) stated the outstanding amount in the Plaintiff’s transaction statement as the sales claim against the Defendant on December 1, 2016, including F cafeteria, G, and H cafeteria (see, e.g., Evidence No. 1; 26,27, supra); (d) stated the outstanding amount in the Plaintiff’s transaction statement as the sales claim against the Defendant; and (e) stated the outstanding amount in the Plaintiff’s transaction statement as the sales claim against the Defendant at his own discretion after the Plaintiff’s sales claim against the Defendant was reflected as the sales claim; and (e) stated the outstanding amount in the Defendant’s transaction statement as the Defendant’s sales claim as the sales claim to the Defendant; and (e) stated the outstanding amount in the Defendant’s account statement as the Defendant’s sales claim as the Defendant’s sales claim as the Defendant’s sales claim.