A. 1) misunderstanding of facts and assertion of justifiable acts (as to the part of the original facts of the judgment, the part of the medical act without a license), regardless of the symptoms of customers, the Defendant conducted a fluoral or bluoral bluoral bluoring the part of the customer, regardless of the symptoms of the customer. The Defendant’s act of the Defendant’s fluoring the part of his fluoral bluoring or bluoring the part of his fluoral bluoral bluor, in accordance with the traditional fluoral bluor method in Korea, used the cosmetic fluoring method, and did not have any other treatment instruments or drugs, and did not have any side effects, such as the diagnosis or fluoring of the customer. As such, it is difficult to view that the act of the Defendant’s fluoral breath as well as the act of the Defendant’s fluoral brut to the extent that it could cause harm to the general public health and health.

3) Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment. B. In light of all the sentencing conditions of this case of unfair sentencing, the court below’s sentence (one year of imprisonment and