beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.16 2018구합63564

손실보상금

Text

1. The defendant

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 21,400,000 and the annual rate of KRW 5% from January 12, 2018 to October 16, 2018, respectively.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) 1) Project name: Public announcement of project implementation authorization (F Housing Redevelopment Project) for housing redevelopment projects (F Housing Redevelopment Project) in Ansan-si: Defendant; G public announcement of Ansan-si ( September 22, 2015); H public announcement of Ansan-si (H ( March 3, 2017);

(b) Objects of expropriation (Plaintiff B, C, D, and E 1) by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on July 31, 2017: The date of commencement of expropriation of the Plaintiff B, C, D, and E 2: The date of commencement of expropriation: The compensation for losses on September 14, 2017: as shown in attached Table 1.

(c) Objects of expropriation (Plaintiff A) by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on November 27, 2017: The date of commencement of expropriation of each real estate listed in attached Form 1 of Plaintiff A: January 11, 2018: The compensation for losses on January 3, 2018: as shown in attached Form 1;

(d) Adjudication (Plaintiff A) by the Central Land Tribunal on June 21, 2018 (Plaintiff A): as shown in attached Table 1;

(e) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling (Plaintiff B, C, D, and E) on an objection made on July 19, 2018: The fact that there is no dispute (based on recognition), as described in attached Table 1, Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. Determination

A. Since the amount of compensation determined by the ruling on the objection of this case does not reach the market price, the defendant is obligated to pay the difference between the reasonable compensation and the above compensation amount to the plaintiffs.

B. The facts of recognition are as follows. Each real estate of this case is located in the vicinity of the Gu I community service center in Ansan-si, and large-scale apartment complexes, universities, forests, etc. are mixed around the north. The surrounding areas include national highways, highways, railroad stations, bus stops, and traffic conditions are infinite. Each land of this case is a square, square, square, square, square, or irregular form, which constitutes a flat or perfect slope, and each building of this case is used as a multi-household, apartment, commercial building, which is subject to sectional ownership, as a building on each land of this case. 2) The court appraisal of each land of this case is normal.