2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a police officer on March 2007 and served as a police officer at the Gyeongbuk Provincial Police Agency, and from March 2013, the Plaintiff entered the law school at the Gyeongbuk National University (hereinafter “Gyeongbuk National University”) and attended the current three-year period.

B. From September 1, 2014 to October 2 of the same year, the Board of Audit and Inspection confirmed that the Plaintiff was absent from 10 times from 30 times a total of the subjects of the first semester of 2013, and notified the Defendant on March 13, 2015 as the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirement for attendance under Article 36 of the Regulations on the Regulations of Gyeongbuk-do University.

C. On April 15, 2015, the Defendant notified the president of the Gyeonggi-do University of the content that eight relevant students, including the Plaintiff, should take measures to revoke the grade and submit the results of measures taken (hereinafter “instant notification”).

D. On June 4, 2015, the president of the Gyeonggi-do University changed the credits of the Plaintiff’s “Civil Act 1” subject from A+F.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 16 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the lawsuit of this case is lawful

According to the above facts of recognition, the notification of this case is merely an act between administrative agencies by notifying or ordering the president of the Gyeongbuk University, who is a national university, to take measures against the plaintiff, and is conducted within the administrative agency, and is not externally conducted by the plaintiff as the counter-party (the plaintiff may directly contest the disposition of sexual change to the F credits taken by the president of the Gyeongbuk University, or the disposition of refusal to revoke the application for sexual change. Further, even if the sexual change of this case taken by the president of the Gyeongbuk University is in accordance with the defendant's notification of this case to the plaintiff, the notification of this case shall be directly contested against the plaintiff, and as long as the president actually performed such act, it shall be deemed that the act of the president is subject to appeal, and the act of another administrative agency shall not be subject to appeal.)

Therefore, the lawsuit of this case seeking the cancellation of the notification of this case is unlawful, and the defendant's defense prior to the merits pointing this out is with merit.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, we decide to dismiss the lawsuit of this case and decide as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Gin-young

Judges Sok-beon