2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

3.Paragraph 1.

A. On August 16, 2011, the Plaintiff leased KRW 50 million to Nonparty C at an annual interest rate of 39% and due date of repayment on August 15, 2016.

On February 9, 2012, in order to secure the repayment of this loan obligation, C transferred to the Defendant the ownership of the goods listed in the separate sheet and of the flat scooma 300 x 600 x 600 ) and of the ownership of the Dabane 20 mar (new, Jink Daza 355 mar) by means of a change in possession.

b. On December 5, 2012, the Plaintiff made a loan to C at the interest rate of KRW 25 million per annum and on December 5, 2017. On the same day, C transferred the ownership of KRW 320 x 500 to the Defendant by means of an extension of possession of ownership of KRW 25 million (STS 320 x 500) in order to secure the repayment of the loan obligation. On the same day, C drafted a notarial deed (No. 413, 2012, No. 413, a notary public of Yong-Nam-Nam Law Firm) of a contract for the repayment of the loan obligation.

C. However, C did not pay the interest of the above loan to the Plaintiff.

According to Article 6 of the Notarial Deed of this case, "if an obligor delays the payment of this fund, the obligor shall, as a matter of course, lose the benefit of time for the obligation and immediately repay all of the remainder of the obligation."

On April 4, 2014, C and the Defendant drafted a sales contract stating that “C sell to the Defendant a unit of 20 million won a unit of the unification unification hall (270 x 1,000 x 20 x 1,000 x 20 x 45 x 20 x 1 x 1.5 xbling (1.5 x 1.5)”.

E. The items in the attached list of the Notarial Deed in this case are identical to the two unit of the Uniform Round (270 x 1,000 x 20 x 1,00) , the first unit of the Dominma (20 x 45) , and the first unit of the Domins (1.5 x 5 x 1.5 ), which are prepared between C and the Defendant, and currently possessed by the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, A No. 1.