소유권이전등기
1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, the Defendant was subject to consultation on October 17, 2014.
. The following facts are without dispute between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, and Eul evidence No. 3.
The Plaintiff, the Defendant, C, D, E, and F are siblings of the network G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).
B. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) was owned by the Deceased. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the respective real estate of this case as a result of inheritance by consultation and division as of July 19, 2006, No. 14430, which was received on July 19, 2006, and April 30, 2006.
C. On October 16, 2014, the children of the deceased, including the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter “instant consultations”) entered into an inheritance distribution consultation (hereinafter “instant consultation”). During the instant consultations, the relevant contents are as follows.
Inheritance distribution consultation * Inheritance distribution consultation * Inheritance division registration shall be implemented as follows:
1. Penalties - The defendant - the defendant - the defendant - the wife population H (excluding the whole of the following contents) in Gyeonggi-do - Each real estate of this case
4. The transfer registration of ownership shall be within one year; and
- The defendant shall make an equal distribution with the current inheritance tax and public charges and shall provide it in advance.
5.To consult above with the top priority on inherited property.
If any other problem exists, the heirs shall endeavour in consultation with gender.
6. Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I - (The successors agree on the cooperation of various documents) - The date of division of final inherited property after consultation on October 2, 2014 shall be closed on October 2, 2014;
A. We examine the determination on the cause of the claim, and the consultation in this case that the CDefendantDF Plaintiff, the deceased’s children, held on October 16, 2014 that part of the deceased’s inherited property transferred to the Defendant, would be divided into several parts, and accordingly, the Defendant agreed to transfer the ownership of each of the instant real property to the Plaintiff on October 17, 2014 as the date of the consultation division.