When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates C in the name of the company in charge of dispute settlement to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's defense right.

On February 8, 2010, the Defendant entered into a sales contract with the total sum of eight households (101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302, 401, 402, and 402) in the name of E and Pyeongtaek-si located in Pyeongtaek-si F, the Defendant, under the above C’s name, entered into a sales contract with the total sum of 64,000,000 won, while the ownership of the remaining seven households except subparagraph 301 was transferred, but the ownership of the above 301 was not transferred due to the failure to pay part of the purchase price, while the Defendant was willing to enter into the lease contract at will by deceiving the lessee, as if he was delegated with the authority to enter into the lease contract from the above E.

1. Preparation of qualification documents;

A. On October 7, 2010, the Defendant instructed H to prepare a lease contract and a receipt of down payment, and H around October 7, 2012, around 105, the Defendant placed in the real estate column for the land for the lease contract: (a) “G Loans 104 Do 301 Do 104 Do 301 Do 105 Do 105 Do 105 Do 105 Do 105 Do 1000 Do 1000 Do 1000 in the real estate column for the land for the lease contract; (b) “Japan 504 Do 504 Do 1504 Do 504 Do 104 Do 20000; (c) written in the resident registration number column for the lessor’s resident registration number column, “K” in the lessor’s agent

On the issue column of the receipt form at the same place, H continued to place the “20,000 won”, “104/301, G non-104/301 in Gyeonggi-do Pyeongtaek-siF”, “contract deposit”, “E,” “E,” and “D” on the face column of the money, and affix a seal on the name of E.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising his proxy qualification, uses the E proxy qualification.