사기등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 3,00,000 won.
The defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
Around 14:00 on June 14, 2013, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant, at the home of the victim Z in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y of quasi-rape, 2 million won out of the agreed amount of 5 million won in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y of quasi-rape, will come to an agreement instead of being well aware of the father of the instant case.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not know the father of the victim of quasi-rape, and thought that he would use the agreed amount received from the victim as casino gambling money, so that he did not have the intention or ability to make the agreement on behalf of the victim.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received three million won from the victim’s occupation.
"2013 Highest 911"
1. On October 30, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the victim would pay 30,000 won to the victim in installments each ten months from October 30, 2012 to July 30, 2013, in the victim AB store in the Jung-gu Daejeon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City AB market, for sale of at least 480,000 won X-ray 1 food functional health foods, and pay the remainder in installments every ten months from October 30 to July 30, 2013.”
However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the above flive flive flive flives were purchased by X-ray.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained X-ray 1 gambling from the victim, which is, falalg in the tin, and acquired it by deception.
2. On November 5, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she was in office as the head of AF management department at the victim AE apartment 602 located in Jung-gu Daejeon District AE apartment 602, and that he/she was in office as the head of AF management department, and that he/she provided the victim’s children to AF.
However, the defendant did not have worked in AF and did not have an intention or ability to find employment for the victims.
The Defendant is as above.