2. The judgment of the defendant has reached the trial for the first time, and all of the crimes of this case are recognized and reflected, and the fact that the damaged part of the theft crime of this case was temporarily returned to the victim is favorable to the defendant.

However, the fact that the defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime several times, the degree of injury suffered by the victim was relatively significant, and the fact that no letter was received from the victims of each of the crimes of this case or there was no smooth agreement with the victims, and the court below did not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of the court below's sentencing even in light of the various sentencing factors in the proceedings of this case including the defendant's age, character and conduct, etc. taking into account the sentencing factors in the proceedings of this case including various circumstances in consideration of sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.