Punishment for A 4,00,000 (private million) Won and fine for Defendant B 6,00.

1. On June 5, 2016, Defendant A shouldered B of a singing receiver who was under influence of alcohol at the singing rooms operated by Defendant C, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, and underground, and Defendant A filed a 112 report in order to stop B and B, even though he continued to have been under influence of a large television in the process of destroying the front glass of the large television, franchising the Defendant, as franchis themselves, even though franchising B from divings go through the process of destroying the front glass of the large television.

Even though G was waiting for an emergency medical service worker on the 119th report to treat B after receiving a report, Defendant A sent the police officer F to F on the ground that he did not immediately take measures against B, Defendant A sent the F on the 119 emergency medical service worker to the police officer, and carried the F on the 119 emergency medical service worker, and pushed the F on the 119 emergency medical service worker, and pushed the F on the 1st floor as well as the 119 emergency medical service worker.

Defendant

A, as such, has interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning handling 112 reports.

2. Defendant B was at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph and at the same time and in the same circumstance as in the preceding paragraph, the dispute between A and A was avoided from the situation where he was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 by the member of the Seoul Eastdong Police Station E District, which was called out. Defendant B carried the chest of police officers G in two hand, displayed both arms towards G face, and destroyed I’s left arms on the first floor for treatment together with I belonging to the H Safety Center, which was called out at the site upon receiving a report of 119.

Defendant

B As such, the police officer's 112 report processing and the fire officer's 119 report processing interfered with the legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of 112 Report Statement), investigation report (to hear telephone statements with I);

1. Application of CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the Defendants of the relevant criminal facts

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.