beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.22 2016가단27372

대여금등

Text

1. The Defendant calculated the Plaintiff at the rate of 61,285,906 won and 24% per annum from June 29, 2016 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

Although there is no dispute between the parties or each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 [the defendant alleged that Gap evidence No. 1 was forged, the defendant voluntarily admitted that Gap evidence No. 5 (Certificate of Seal No. 5) was delivered to Eul, and the defendant's name is identical with Gap evidence No. 5 (Certificate of Seal No. 5) according to the court's verification of comparison of the seal No. 1, and the authenticity of the document is presumed to have been established as a whole, since the defendant's seal No. 1 was recognized as identical to the defendant's seal No. 5 (Certificate No. 5) according to the result of examination of the court's seal No. 1 and the whole statement No. 440, 60, 360, 360, 96, 96, 70, 96, 96, 70, 96, 96, 96, 96, 60, 96, 70, 96, 96, 7, 7, 96, 6, etc.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so ordered as per Disposition.