beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.04.18 2014고단328

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment for fraud and larceny, and 2 years of suspended sentence on February 2, 2011, in the Suwon District Court Ansan Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 2, 201, but on May 17, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment for fraud in the same court, and the said suspended sentence was revoked on September 5, 201, and the execution of each of the said suspended sentence was terminated in the Ansan Prison on January 18, 2012.

1. Fraud;

A. On January 26, 2014, at around 07:40, the Defendant entered the “EPC” room located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-si, operated by the Victim C, and appears to have been able to pay the cost of using the PC, even though there was no intent or ability to pay the cost of using the PC, from that time, the Defendant used the PC for about 33 hours up to 17:30 hours following the following day.

As such, the Defendant acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to 40,500 won by deceiving the victim and using the PC until the above date and time from the victim.

B. On February 9, 2014, around 18:25, 2014, the Defendant used the PC until February 19, 2014, inasmuch as the Defendant entered the HPC located in Mayang-gu G located in Mayang-gu G located in Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, which was operated by the Victim F, did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost of using the PC.

As such, the Defendant acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to 25,400 won by deceiving the victim and using the PC until the above date and time from the victim.

C. The Defendant, around 16:00 on February 14, 2014, entered the KPC located in the Mayang-gu J in the Mayang-gu where the victim I operated on February 14, 2014, showed the attitude that the Defendant would have been able to pay the cost of using the PC even though he/she had no intent or ability to pay the cost of using the PC.

The defendant deceivings the victim to do so.