(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A

A. A. On March 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a DNA fluoring vehicle from the front side of the 24-3 pactonon city in Gwangju Mine-ro No. 52-ro No. 5094% in the state of alcohol around 22:30 on March 27, 2016 to the front side of the flown-ro in Gwangju Mine-ro No. 502-ro, Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu.

B. The Defendant who had attempted to commit the crime above.

B, as stated in the same paragraph at the time, at the place, after driving a brea vehicle under the influence of alcohol as stated in the same paragraph, caused a traffic accident involving other vehicles, and after the Defendant was driving a brea vehicle at the accident site to avoid driving under the influence of alcohol, upon having requested that “it would have caused an accident that he would drive a brea vehicle because he would not drink, so he would have caused an accident that he would drive a brea vehicle under the influence of alcohol,” and caused B to have the consent B to do so as if he is the driver of the brea vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and made a false statement as described in the following 2.

As a result, the defendant instigated B to escape a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Defendant B’s above 1-B

On March 28, 2016, as described in the paragraph, around 01:40 on March 28, 2016, according to A’s teacher, alcohol measurement was conducted at the office of the traffic accident investigation department of the Gwangju Western Police Station located in 71 as the Seo-gu Standing Park, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and made a false statement as if he was involved in the accident while driving the said mother-fluor vehicle, and at the above office around March 14:50, 2016, a false statement was made for the same purpose.

Accordingly, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, was allowed to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made against F and Defendant B;

1. The fact-finding report, the fact-finding report, the fact-finding report, and the fact-finding report, respectively;