However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 00:00 on March 24, 2016, the Defendant entered the main place operated by the victim D (name, doer, 62 years of age) located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the beer. On the same day, around 02:00, the Defendant told the victim that “the victim has finished business hours,” and then the victim was able to do so, the victim was able to do so, and the victim was her body of the victim and her body was pushed down, and she continued to do so after being pushed up, and the victim was able to report the victim’s cell phone to the main place where the victim was her resistance and getting off the victim’s cell phone, and then she placed the victim on the front side of the ske, and then she placed the victim on the part of the victim, and then put the victim on the front side of the ske, and then she ske out the number of days of treatment for the victim’s left side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing victim DNA photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (such as the fact that there is no previous conviction beyond a fine, the confession and reflect of the crime in this case, the fact that the crime is contingent, and the fact that there is old parents to support);