2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

(a) Plaintiff’s entry into the Republic of Korea and refugee application - Plaintiff’s nationality: Pakistan - Entry and refugee application: Entry on September 28, 2014 [Status of Sojourn: Short-term visit (C-3)] on December 10, 2014

B. The Defendant’s decision not to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) - Grounds for not recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”): No sufficiently-founded fear of fear that is likely to be harmful to gambling may be recognized.

(c) Plaintiff’s filing of an objection and decision of dismissal - Decision of dismissal: The fact that there is no dispute on March 23, 2016 (based on recognition), Gap’s 1, 2, Eul’s 1, 2, and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was subject to intimidation around July 201, on the grounds that the Plaintiff joined as a member of the PakistanNP (AWP) and that he/she supported the government’s military personnel on the grounds that he/she had assisted the government’s military personnel on June 201 and July 2014.

Since the return to the Republic of Pakistan is likely to be detrimental to persecution, the plaintiff is a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act provides that “Refugee” means a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to a well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence as seen earlier, when comprehensively considering the following circumstances, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the disposition of this case, which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for recognition of refugee status, is legitimate.

(1)