건물퇴거
1. For the plaintiff B:
A. Defendant C is each of the following: drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 of the annexed drawings among the buildings listed in the attached list.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 as to the plaintiff Eul's claim, the plaintiff Eul is the owner of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E 53.9 square meters and F 13.2 square meters (hereinafter "the site of this case"). The defendant C is the 52.9 square meters inside the ship connecting each point of the annexed drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 among the buildings listed in the annexed Form Nos. 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 among the buildings listed in the annexed Form Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 49.8 square meters in the ship connected each point in sequence among the buildings listed in the annexed Form No. 2.
Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to withdraw from each of the above possession parts to the Plaintiff, the owner of the instant land.
The defendants are legitimate lessees with regard to the above occupied portion, and they cannot move out before being returned the deposit and the time facility. However, the defendants' above assertion does not affect the plaintiff B's claim. Thus, the defendants' above assertion is without merit.
2. Although Plaintiff A also sought a eviction from the Defendants, Plaintiff A is not the present owner of the instant site, and Plaintiff A’s above assertion is not acceptable.
3. Thus, the plaintiff Eul's claim is justified, and the plaintiff Eul's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.