사기
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud to victims E;
A. On March 29, 2006, the Defendant: (a) worked as an employee at G cafeteria operated by the victim E located in Busan Metropolitan City, and said that his name was H.
Then, the victim made a false statement to the effect that “Afinites need to make a finites worth one million won as it is necessary to make a finites. It was transferred to the agricultural bank account in the name of the finites.”
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 1 million from the victim to his agricultural bank account.
B. The Defendant was above around April 7, 2006.
The above victim E made such a false statement at the place described in the paragraph.
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 1 million from the victim to his agricultural bank account.
As a result, the defendant was issued a total of 2 million won by deceiving the victim E twice.
2. Fraud against victim I;
A. On May 10, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement at a restaurant in the K apartment construction site operated by the victim I located in the JJ in Busan-si, Busan-si, stating, “Around May 10, 2007, the Defendant borrowed KRW 300,000 won under the name of the pre-paid payment to the previous employees.”
However, the defendant did not have the ability to pay the advance payment even after receiving the advance payment from the victim.
The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 300,000 won immediately from the victim.
B. The Defendant was above around May 13, 2007.
At the place described in the subsection, “1 million won is required. It was false to lend 1 million won under the name of the pre-paid payment to the victim I in the future.”
However, the defendant is guilty.