When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 15, 2018, the Defendant was in the parking lot for a 389 official door-ro 00:40 Gyeong-gu, Gyeonggi Pyeong-gu, Gyeonggi-do on April 15, 2018.

“A police officer, who was sent after receiving the report 112, inquireds about the personal information of the police officer C of the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station B police box, and responded to this question, and assaulted C’s face of drinking during the drinking process, i.e., “f. f. f. f. f. f.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was written on the way by the Defendant, and used violence against the police officers who want to help the Defendant, who is going to go out of the way.

However, the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected.

The defendant is an initial criminal who has no record of criminal punishment.

Other punishment shall be determined as per the order, in consideration of the age, sex, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc. of the defendant.