beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.05.26 2016고단547

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2016 High Order 547 【The Defendant, the victims of the multi-stage fraud, told C et al., “I wish to find out the fraudulent damage concealed through military intelligence organizations,” and led C et al. to display the certificate of the balance of the accounts of D (Gu E) in order to believe that the recovery of the damage is smoothly being carried out.

1. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at the Defendant’s home located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Building 702; (b) using computers, copied the Defendant’s “D (Gu E); (c)”, “30,000,000,000”; and (d) “G’s name column of deposit holder, deposit column, and amount amount of the balance certificate of the Defendant’s account issued in advance after preparing and printing it,” and then copied the document by using the following composite equipment, respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the balance certificate in the name of the bank, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant exercised the aforementioned investigation document by using the forged balance certificate to J, C, K, L, M, and N as if they were duly formed at the “I” coffee shop located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu.

【2016 Highest 730 [Defendant] On August 28, 2010, the Defendant would lend the victim P with “30 million won” until September 10, 2010 in the Defendant’s residence located in Yongsan-gu Seoul apartment site, Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the victim P, and will return the victim to Samsung C&T Co., Ltd., for whom the victim had previously been employed on October 1 of the same year.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the amount as agreed even if the Defendant borrowed the amount from the injured party because there was no particular revenue or property, and there was no intention or ability to recover the victim because there was no relationship with Samsung C&T corporation.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.