When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 3, 2017, around 20:15, the Defendant driven CAW-purn-purd-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purged-purging-type

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking alcohol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include not only the fact that the defendant was punished three times as a fine for the same kind of crime, but also the defendant committed the crime in this case without being punished as a fine even though the period during which the defendant was under suspension of execution due to the same crime. While there are no unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's blood alcohol concentration in the blood is equal to 0.165% at the time of driving, the defendant's mistake is contrary to the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, criminal records, criminal records, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions set forth in the arguments of this case.