When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 26, 2014, at around 01:25, the Defendant, at around 01:25, 1856, she was fluored to a fluor of a free will (a: 150cm, 60cm in length) used by public offices on the ground that the Defendant did not take his/her horse within the 1856 Authenticity of Pyeongtaek-si, according to the 1856 Authenticity, and caused the Defendant’s use of such a fluor of a fluor of a free will (a: 150cm in length).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Even though there was a record of being punished by a fine as a crime of inflicting an injury on the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, there is a need to punish the defendant who has damaged public goods in the police box again.

On the other hand, in determining the punishment, the punishment shall be imposed as ordered in consideration of various sentencing factors such as the defendant's recognition of the crime, the fact that the defendant is still a juvenile of 18 years old, the fact that there is no record of crime exceeding the fine, the value of the damaged goods does not exceed 44,200 won, the fact that the defendant has compensated equivalent to the value of the goods, and the family relation of the defendant.