When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 18, 2014, around 00:30 on July 18, 2014, the Defendant was boarding the Masi operated by the victim B in front of the Songpa-gu Seoul White-ro 136 (locked-dong), and was making a false statement to the victim B as if he would pay the fee.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any means to pay the taxi charges, such as cash or card, during the time of boarding the above taxi, so there was no intention or ability to pay the taxi charges.

The Defendant had the victim operate the said taxi to the front of the apartment complex of Songpa-gu Seoul locked-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and did not pay KRW 8,880,00, and acquired the same pecuniary profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on charges receipt;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;