2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is the chairperson of the E- Service Association, who is the management body of the Seoul Jung-gu D shopping mall (hereinafter “instant shopping mall”), and the Defendant B operates the store in the trade name of “F” from around 2000 to “F.”

B. From around March 2009, the water pipes were connected to F through the restaurant called G of the above commercial building (hereinafter “instant water pipes”). However, H, who operated the said G, entrusted Defendant C with construction works to restore the said water pipes to its original state, and Defendant C cut the said water pipes to Defendant C around 09:0 on March 16, 2013, and re-entered them to Defendant B’s paragraph.

C. On May 30, 2013, from around March 2009 to August 2013, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Government’s Office of Public Prosecutor’s Office (2013-type and 48779) to the effect that Defendant B used the tap water of the said commercial building from around March 30, 2013 to stolen and interfered with the business of the said commercial building number council, but the disposition was rendered to the effect that he was suspected of being on October 31, 2013.

On May 7, 2013, Defendant B filed a complaint with the Plaintiff under charges of interference with the business of the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office (2013-type and 29103) on charges of interfering with the business of the Plaintiff, and “the Plaintiff was not guilty of having the Defendant C, who is a father of the Seoul Northern District Court, removal of the next G cafeteria from the first floor of the public toilet around March 16, 2013, at around 09:0, the Defendant C sent an order to cut the water pipe connected with the Defendant BF via the above restaurant to cut the water pipe from the victim’s possession, thereby hindering its utility, and preventing the Plaintiff from operating the water pipe at the same time and place as above, and obstructing the Defendant’s formal trial, thereby obstructing the Plaintiff’s use of the said summary order by force of the Defendant C’s 1 to 301-1,000,000 won.”