A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.

1. Defendant A is a park management facility owner in the F viewing Urban Environment Bureau from April 6, 2007 to January 1, 201, and a local facility owner in charge of the creation of a park. A public official in charge of the management and supervision, etc. of a park creation project, who is in charge of the affairs of selecting a company that can participate in a tender conducted by the Public Procurement Service in connection with the above construction project, and G operates a H branch office that manufactures road packaging materials and operates a children’s park, a book-ro, and a bicycle track construction project owner.

around the second half of November 23, 2007, the Defendant received a request from G to the national bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant, and received a request from G to supply road packing materials, etc. to the public works ordered by H, such as roads, packaging materials, etc. for the F viewing Urban Environment Bureau, and continued to maintain a friendly relationship with G and G, etc., while he continued to do so, he received a request from G to the effect that “if he supplies the road packing materials after drilling, he will change the Do.” On November 23, 2007, the Defendant received a request from G to the effect that “if he supplies the road packing materials after drilling, he will do so.” The Defendant received a bribe from G to the national bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant on December 4, 2007, and received a bribe of KRW 700,000,000 from early 208 to late 208.

2. Defendant B served as a newspaper reporter from around 2002 to December 201, 201.

Around September 4, 2007, the Defendant received KRW 2,00,000 from H’s business G to the effect that “a public official in charge may introduce and order construction works with respect to the construction works ordered by K Si,” and received the statement from the public official in charge, under the pretext of the case cost, to a single bank account (L) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and in the above manner, received KRW 50,000 on September 24, 2007.