도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant only sleeps in a motor vehicle after moving the drinking to a sleep driver, and sleeps in the motor vehicle, and has not driven under the influence of alcohol.
2. As acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant was found to have driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol as stated in the judgment of the court below, in full view of the following facts: (a) although the defendant moved to a substitute driver after drinking, as the defendant was unable to properly inform his destination after drinking the motor vehicle of his destination, the substitute driver left the motor vehicle at the edge of the road of the Seocho-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-on-child-car-on-child-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car-car
3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.