2. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, the period of business is shorter, the size of money exchange is small, business profit is less, the game machine used by the defendant has some different points from the original contents of rating classification, but it is difficult to view that the prosecution does not prosecute this part, the game machine and money are confiscated and operating profit is collected, and the normal work activities are being performed after the crackdown on the crime of this case. However, the violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry of this case is a crime that causes damage to a healthy game culture and promotion of speculative spirit by exchanging game result, and its nature is not good, the defendant's assertion that there is no reason for the crime of this case to conceal the punishment of this case including the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry by the defendant on May 28, 2010, the suspension of execution of imprisonment with prison labor for August 2, 200, and the method of confiscation and collection, and the circumstances that the defendant employed the defendant's office of this case after the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.