저작권법위반
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. Defendant B is the representative of Defendant A, and Defendant A is a corporation established for the purpose of engaging in the manufacturing and selling business of the fire-proof machine manufacturing and selling business, electronic commerce (communication sales business), and investment, lease, management, and trading business of real estate. A.
Defendant
B No person shall infringe on the methods of reproduction, performance, public transmission, exhibition, distribution, lending, or preparation of derivative works of author's property rights or other property rights protected pursuant to the Copyright Act.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, from August 16, 2018 to November 6, 2011 of the same year, appears to be a clerical error, and thus, ex officio correction is made inasmuch as the “Gu H buildings and Is during Yangyang-si” written indictments in militarypos are deemed to be a clerical error.
After installing the F program illegally reproduced on the computers (IP E) in the office in the A-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B
B. Defendant A, a corporation, or an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation or an individual, has not been negligent in exercising due care and supervision over the pertinent business to prevent a violation in connection with the business of the corporation or the individual, but Defendant B infringed on the author’s property right as described in the preceding paragraph.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 141 and 136 (1) of the Copyright Act;
(b) Offenses subject to prosecution: Article 140 of the Copyright Act.
(b) Declaration of revocation of complaint by a complainant agent after prosecution;
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;